CULLMAN —
The continuing debate over what defines a healthy meal in public school is reaching new levels of absurdity.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is blamed for leaving many students craving more to eat in the last schools years because of restrictions on the amount of meats and grains that can be offered to individuals in the cafeteria line. Bowing to criticism, the USDA is backing off a bit and allowing school districts to add some options that essentially increase the meats and grains available. And students can also have plenty of fries and mashed potatoes.
At the heart of the controversy is growing concern about the expanding waistlines of students. Yet, parents know that for years students have been able to purchase calorie-rich soft drinks and candy.
Older Americans — not seniors — may remember that school cafeterias were once rich with balanced offerings of vegetables and meats. Soft drink machines were nowhere close to the schools and water and milk were available for drinks.
The truth about school lunches is that students need balanced meals, not soft drinks and candy. And they need regular exercise. The rest of the health issue should be left to families. If a child becomes overweight because of a sedentary lifestyle at home, that’s a parental issue, not a government nutritional matter.
Serving students fresh meats and vegetables is sensible. Eliminating junk food from schools is sensible, too. The hope for better health among students could receive a boost if the students were actually involved in learning and preparing food.
When the government steps in and declares that tomato paste on a pizza counts as a vegetable, something’s wrong. Where’s the logic? Offer students slices of fresh tomato adorned with cottage cheese or blue cheese and olive oil dressing. But paste?
Local school districts are well equipped to determine what is nutritional for students. Just take away the junk at school. The double standard is glaring.
Editorials
EDITORIAL: Take away the junk food
- Editorials
-
-
Editorial: Seizure of AP phone records insult to independent press
This amounts to spying on an American news organization -- common practice in dictatorships but scary conduct in a democratic system that prizes the public value of an independent watchdog press.
-
EDITORIAL: The IRS' Turn to Answer Questions
Washington is now sinking its teeth into a real scandal: the Internal Revenue Service using ideological criteria to choose the targets of its attention.
-
Editorial: The house of death
The grisly details emerging from the murder trial of a Philadelphia abortion doctor place a glaring spotlight on a national disgrace.
-
Editorial: Murder, insanity and guns
James Holmes, the accused movie theater shooter in Colorado, would like for the public to believe he killed a dozen people because he was insane.
-
Lasting partnerships
Economic development officials have long noted the importance of expansions by existing industries and businesses in a community to lead growth.
-
COMMENTARY: Why does young adult fiction keep giving its heroines makeovers?
Over at This Ain't Living, s.e. smith (who, full disclosure, has guest-blogged for me at ThinkProgress) has an excellent post about one of the most pernicious trends in young adult fiction.
-
A spirit for moving forward
This weekend marked the two-year anniversary of a deadly day of tornadoes that streaked across Alabama, claiming lives and property and changing the landscape of many communities.
-
Faith and bombs
The investigation of the Boston Marathon bombing is pointing to the all-too-familiar theme of religious faith playing a major role in violence.
-
Keeping the US safe
The empty streets of Boston as authorities searched for two terror suspects was an eerie reminder of the vulnerability of innocent people.
-
A time for change
Alabama lawmakers will head into the final stretch of the legislative session with a new member on board, Randall Shedd of Cullman County.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
Editorial: Seizure of AP phone records insult to independent press



